New views on in-season BABS
We are 10 weeks in and the BABS database was updated over the weekend. Your survey results have gotten me to rethink how we use BABS during the season, so I've started to reimagine different presentations of the data.
First, some clarifications from recent reader emails. The "2017p" line in the database represents our pre-season expectations for each player. That "p" is misleading, I suppose, but it does not represent balance-of-season projections.
In truth, once you are past your draft, you probably should not be using those "2017p" ratings at all. It's better . . .
This content is restricted to subscribers